Information on Result #3027738
There is no (88, 215, 176)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (88, 214, 176)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 32214 200757 889296 368225 201507 465283 864197 194480 783001 861555 812296 > 2214 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.