Information on Result #473550
There is no (88, 214, 176)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 32214 200757 889296 368225 201507 465283 864197 194480 783001 861555 812296 > 2214
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 215, 176)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |