Information on Result #3027740
There is no (88, 219, 174)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (88, 218, 174)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 540183 754685 549732 150294 216815 748409 380562 564045 742267 752014 995518 > 2218 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.