Information on Result #473823
There is no (88, 218, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 540183 754685 549732 150294 216815 748409 380562 564045 742267 752014 995518 > 2218
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 219, 174)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |