Information on Result #3027752
There is no (88, 243, 165)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (88, 242, 165)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8 688683 158240 833530 620922 615982 777121 766460 452450 463377 888782 184192 266160 > 2242 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.