Information on Result #475559
There is no (88, 242, 165)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8 688683 158240 833530 620922 615982 777121 766460 452450 463377 888782 184192 266160 > 2242
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 243, 165)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |