Information on Result #3027834
There is no (89, 208, 184)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 207, 184)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 243 923557 852455 325638 788658 334528 020904 535466 841903 846680 184848 > 2207 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.