Information on Result #473084

There is no (89, 207, 184)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 243 923557 852455 325638 788658 334528 020904 535466 841903 846680 184848 > 2207

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 208, 184)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction