Information on Result #3027851
There is no (89, 242, 168)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 241, 168)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 4 664441 979556 241029 570961 722443 436600 442053 865515 974245 233179 796403 044200 > 2241 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.