Information on Result #475484

There is no (89, 241, 168)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 4 664441 979556 241029 570961 722443 436600 442053 865515 974245 233179 796403 044200 > 2241

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 242, 168)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction