Information on Result #3028008
There is no (91, 180, 230)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (91, 179, 230)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 767945 292862 876955 714737 034659 525318 005667 882476 666888 > 2179 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.