Information on Result #471372

There is no (91, 179, 230)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 767945 292862 876955 714737 034659 525318 005667 882476 666888 > 2179

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 180, 230)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction