Information on Result #3028032
There is no (91, 216, 185)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (91, 215, 185)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55817 833901 710325 202029 761577 761671 364695 007318 669292 391258 532864 > 2215 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.