Information on Result #473619

There is no (91, 215, 185)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55817 833901 710325 202029 761577 761671 364695 007318 669292 391258 532864 > 2215

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 216, 185)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction