Information on Result #3028405
There is no (95, 216, 200)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (95, 215, 200)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55759 381229 715867 184183 062430 358754 684335 874471 727977 978783 379688 > 2215 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.