Information on Result #3031625
There is no (131, 178, 1921)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (131, 177, 1921)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 191652 665302 787413 800859 487416 074008 149301 064570 605568 > 2177 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.