Information on Result #471279

There is no (131, 177, 1921)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 191652 665302 787413 800859 487416 074008 149301 064570 605568 > 2177

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 178, 1921)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction