Information on Result #3031802
There is no (133, 220, 516)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (133, 219, 516)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 885832 843308 488167 097504 475110 046116 245945 193357 250827 591371 242048 > 2219 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.