Information on Result #473914
There is no (133, 219, 516)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 885832 843308 488167 097504 475110 046116 245945 193357 250827 591371 242048 > 2219
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (133, 220, 516)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |