Information on Result #3033497
There is no (160, 229, 1364)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (160, 228, 1364)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 438 403331 070517 236618 007099 624346 557304 644874 476501 080048 150153 893598 > 2228 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.