Information on Result #474563

There is no (160, 228, 1364)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 438 403331 070517 236618 007099 624346 557304 644874 476501 080048 150153 893598 > 2228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 229, 1364)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction