Information on Result #3033549
There is no (161, 222, 1944)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (161, 221, 1944)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 381864 473945 765655 440065 547090 242649 600507 120477 440944 045481 299760 > 2221 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.