Information on Result #474067

There is no (161, 221, 1944)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 381864 473945 765655 440065 547090 242649 600507 120477 440944 045481 299760 > 2221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 222, 1944)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction