Information on Result #3033717
There is no (164, 229, 1739)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (164, 228, 1739)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 436 001797 163012 961403 031059 833898 480042 340503 284575 946794 709266 363946 > 2228 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.