Information on Result #474565
There is no (164, 228, 1739)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 436 001797 163012 961403 031059 833898 480042 340503 284575 946794 709266 363946 > 2228
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 229, 1739)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |