Information on Result #3042915
There is no (29, 62, 210)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (29, 61, 210)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 135799 017143 510839 544941 043361 > 361 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.