Information on Result #477672
There is no (29, 61, 210)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 135799 017143 510839 544941 043361 > 361
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (29, 62, 210)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |