Information on Result #3043639
There is no (33, 64, 310)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (33, 63, 310)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 153028 954005 049317 434449 882121 > 363 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.