Information on Result #477713

There is no (33, 63, 310)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 153028 954005 049317 434449 882121 > 363

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 64, 310)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction