Information on Result #3050797
There is no (86, 161, 812)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (86, 160, 812)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 22251 088883 694395 136607 449880 505794 817504 438682 688018 485890 822582 155805 659449 > 3160 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.