Information on Result #481121

There is no (86, 160, 812)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 22251 088883 694395 136607 449880 505794 817504 438682 688018 485890 822582 155805 659449 > 3160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 161, 812)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction