Information on Result #3051891
There is no (99, 164, 1692)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (99, 163, 1692)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 597075 052016 354965 141202 764141 592198 793122 293920 656181 296766 537355 661209 512193 > 3163 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.