Information on Result #481277

There is no (99, 163, 1692)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 597075 052016 354965 141202 764141 592198 793122 293920 656181 296766 537355 661209 512193 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 164, 1692)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction