Information on Result #3054387
There is no (132, 231, 1612)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (132, 230, 1612)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 56 313428 087319 415717 165787 035373 796125 383029 881152 988212 282632 721808 031863 045563 837240 896144 396072 940180 738713 > 3230 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.