Information on Result #485327

There is no (132, 230, 1612)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 56 313428 087319 415717 165787 035373 796125 383029 881152 988212 282632 721808 031863 045563 837240 896144 396072 940180 738713 > 3230

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 231, 1612)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction