Information on Result #3056348
There is no (164, 229, 16014)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (164, 228, 16014)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 082329 076979 039862 885252 704890 398431 831757 369786 758418 706090 515600 069090 062265 279889 444188 036683 240961 778497 > 3228 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.