Information on Result #485204

There is no (164, 228, 16014)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 082329 076979 039862 885252 704890 398431 831757 369786 758418 706090 515600 069090 062265 279889 444188 036683 240961 778497 > 3228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 229, 16014)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction