Information on Result #3056556
There is no (168, 213, 179261)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (168, 212, 179261)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 141165 004198 111012 356522 144689 414443 498554 639512 688926 328902 435792 465937 942487 353684 228809 046414 173361 > 3212 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.