Information on Result #484132

There is no (168, 212, 179261)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 141165 004198 111012 356522 144689 414443 498554 639512 688926 328902 435792 465937 942487 353684 228809 046414 173361 > 3212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 213, 179261)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction