Information on Result #3098292
There is no (36, 169, 682)-net in base 8, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (36, 168, 682)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 56 504552 191282 575993 916528 606586 369169 961677 366366 624868 077554 399340 818150 526344 856459 990411 871621 360941 108182 761900 218140 608772 037123 769878 248615 846440 > 8168 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.