Information on Result #506465

There is no (36, 168, 682)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 56 504552 191282 575993 916528 606586 369169 961677 366366 624868 077554 399340 818150 526344 856459 990411 871621 360941 108182 761900 218140 608772 037123 769878 248615 846440 > 8168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (36, 169, 682)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction