Information on Result #3106227
There is no (16, 43, 850)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (16, 42, 850)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11984 464936 803300 295111 738548 112169 873361 > 942 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.