Information on Result #507019
There is no (16, 42, 850)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11984 464936 803300 295111 738548 112169 873361 > 942
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 43, 850)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |