Information on Result #3106249
There is no (16, 87, 364)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (16, 86, 364)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 12199 182740 641280 550510 826451 260466 734270 945558 899235 195005 762645 541831 101595 589793 > 986 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.