Information on Result #507825
There is no (16, 86, 364)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 12199 182740 641280 550510 826451 260466 734270 945558 899235 195005 762645 541831 101595 589793 > 986
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 87, 364)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |