Information on Result #3106677
There is no (21, 100, 486)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (21, 99, 486)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 30994 263077 086785 390613 870114 937799 626651 769670 997948 219068 457279 073280 413478 025476 793071 431313 > 999 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.