Information on Result #3106685
There is no (21, 116, 469)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (21, 115, 469)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 59 916101 372384 907588 456635 727801 020527 664148 543532 700636 209703 882388 370868 597595 963418 735833 970405 484468 915865 > 9115 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.