Information on Result #508654

There is no (21, 115, 469)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 59 916101 372384 907588 456635 727801 020527 664148 543532 700636 209703 882388 370868 597595 963418 735833 970405 484468 915865 > 9115

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 116, 469)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction