Information on Result #3107334
There is no (31, 80, 1682)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (31, 79, 1682)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2457 650800 736851 914812 783701 268276 674502 208986 813223 192895 335833 072668 419201 > 979 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.