Information on Result #507669

There is no (31, 79, 1682)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2457 650800 736851 914812 783701 268276 674502 208986 813223 192895 335833 072668 419201 > 979

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 80, 1682)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction